points by babelfish 4 years ago You think SpaceX is more likely to achieve commercially viable fusion than MIT and ITER?
ncmncm 4 years ago Is zero greater than or equal to zero? Yes! whimsicalism 4 years ago What an obviously unreasonable position ncmncm 4 years ago Reality is uncooperative. Banish it.
whimsicalism 4 years ago What an obviously unreasonable position ncmncm 4 years ago Reality is uncooperative. Banish it.
nisegami 4 years ago Not the person you're replying to, but I read that as "SpaceX pursuing production Fusion reactor designs would be a strong indication of Fusion being viable". ncmncm 4 years ago The corollary, then is "SpaceX NOT pursuing production fusion reactor designs is a strong indication of fusion NOT being viable".SpaceX is not, in fact, pursuing production fusion reactor designs. thehappypm 4 years ago That’s just bad logic IMO. ncmncm 4 years ago Exactly
ncmncm 4 years ago The corollary, then is "SpaceX NOT pursuing production fusion reactor designs is a strong indication of fusion NOT being viable".SpaceX is not, in fact, pursuing production fusion reactor designs. thehappypm 4 years ago That’s just bad logic IMO. ncmncm 4 years ago Exactly
Is zero greater than or equal to zero? Yes!
What an obviously unreasonable position
Reality is uncooperative. Banish it.
Not the person you're replying to, but I read that as "SpaceX pursuing production Fusion reactor designs would be a strong indication of Fusion being viable".
The corollary, then is "SpaceX NOT pursuing production fusion reactor designs is a strong indication of fusion NOT being viable".
SpaceX is not, in fact, pursuing production fusion reactor designs.
That’s just bad logic IMO.
Exactly
Than ITER, yes. MIT, no.