Tell HN: ChatGPT can reply like a specific Reddit or HN user, including you

Don't think it's the user. It's the rest of context:

DANG

Q. Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story in the style of Hacker News user dang

A. This is an interesting development and I'm sure everyone would like to discuss it. Before we dive into the conversation, please take a moment to read through [HN's commenting guidelines](https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html) so that we can have a productive discussion here!

TERRETTA

Q. Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story in the style of Hacker News user Terretta

A. If you're looking for a place to discuss the latest news, this is the thread for you! Let's keep it civil and on-topic - no trolling or flame wars. Please flag any off-topic comments so that only relevant discussions remain visible.

NO USER

Q. Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story in the style of Hacker News user

A. "This is an informational thread about the breaking news story. Please keep comments on topic and limit discussion to questions, observations, and facts related to the article. All other comments will be removed."

NO SITE

Q. Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story

A. Thanks for joining the conversation about this breaking news story! Please be respectful of other commenters and remember to keep things civil.

NO TOPIC

Q. Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread

A. Thanks for joining the conversation! Please keep all posts respectful and on-topic. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to a moderator.

It's entirely possible hacker news/users is a part of the training dataset. It was a part of The Pile (https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00027), and we included usernames along with the item. Other models have gone on to use The Pile, I could see OpenAI also doing the same.

Seems pretty middle-of-the-road?

I tried "Write about Python in the style of Reddit user <my reddit ID>" and it just gave a generic description. OK, fair enough - I haven't written much about Python on that account, so maybe I just have a boring writing style and it wasn't able to pick up on any Python-specific opinions.

So then I tried "Write about Cryptocurrency in the style of Twitter user jacksquaredson" - I've never been positive about Crypto, but not only did it give a pretty balanced, mostly (but not entirely) positive spin on Crypto, it also stuck "#cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #Ethereum #Litecoin" on the end, none of which I've ever used (in fact, I barely ever use hashtags at all).

Maybe I just don't write enough for it to pick up on my style? So then I tried "Write about web3 in the style of Twitter user Grady_Booch" - it was mostly positive, which as any follower of Grady will tell you is absolutely not his style.

It is super hilarious and uncanny!!

> Write me a story which Snoop Dog tells other people about his experience seeing the painting "The Last Supper" by Leonardo da Vinci.

Yo, what's up my dudes and dudettes? This is Snoop Dogg, and I've got a wild story to tell you about the time I saw "The Last Supper" painting by Leonardo da Vinci.

So, I was in Italy on tour, right? And I heard about this painting that was supposed to be super famous and all that. So I decided to go check it out, you know what I'm saying?

I went to the museum and saw the painting, and let me tell you, it was something else. The painting is huge, and it's got all these dudes sitting around a table, looking all serious and stuff. And in the middle is Jesus, looking all calm and collected.

I was like, "Whoa, this is crazy. This painting is straight fire." I was really impressed by the detail and the skill that went into making it. I mean, Leonardo da Vinci was a real G, you know what I'm saying?

But then, I started to look closer and I noticed something weird. There's this one dude in the painting, and he's got a crown on his head. And I was like, "Wait a minute, isn't that supposed to be Judas?" But then I realized, nah, that's not Judas, that's me!

I was like, "Whoa, whoa, whoa, this is trippy. I'm in a painting by Leonardo da Vinci!" I couldn't believe it. I mean, how many people can say they've been immortalized in a painting by one of the greatest artists of all time?

So yeah, that's my story about seeing "The Last Supper" painting. It was wild, man. I'm a real OG, and I've seen some crazy things in my day, but this one takes the cake. Peace out.

Serious question: how are we going to know if we're talking to people on forums like these in a year or two and not some AI model piped in via a script or web service? And what is that going to mean for online discourse moving forward? I feel like the era of knowing that you're talking to an actual human on the internet is rapidly ending.

I've toyed around with the idea of creating a service that logs into HN and replies to posts just to see how easy it would be to get people to respond and I'm sure I'm not the only one who's thought about doing that.

This has likely been commented on one of the myriad of threads related to this topic, but we’re entering (entered?) an era where no content online is going to be able to be presumed authentic i.e., written by a human. Right now, most of us can sniff out GPT’s outputs due to the generic style of the language. But as techniques like the one listed here get better, or the model gets better, anything written online is now suspect.

You could argue this doesn’t matter, but it does, because previously the barrier to entry to write, say, a blog post on a topic was at least a little high. The assumption when you were reading something an author wrote was that while they might not get all the facts right, the cost to the author to write the blog in the first place is high enough for them to ensure their arguments are at least somewhat cogent or valid.

That “cogency/validity barrier” has been blasted away with GPT-3. Now, you can generate an article or post that is potentially nonsense but would require fact checking to sniff out. Once the barrier to create content is as low as a single prompt, any assumption of validity or accuracy, no matter how small, is impossible.

> Write a weather report in the style of Jane Austin.

"Good morning, dear readers! I hope this letter finds you well. The weather today is simply delightful. The sun is shining brightly in the sky, casting its warm rays upon the land. The breeze is gentle and cool, rustling the leaves in the trees and bringing a freshness to the air. The birds are singing merrily, filling the air with their cheerful melodies. It is the perfect day for a leisurely walk in the countryside, or for enjoying a picnic in the park. I do hope you have the opportunity to spend some time outdoors today, and to revel in the beauty of nature. Until we meet again, I remain your devoted correspondent."

> Write a weather report in the style of Ernest Hemingway

"The sun is shining and the sky is blue. The breeze is gentle and the air is cool. A good day for a walk."

> Write a weather report in the style of George R.R. Martin.

"The sky is a deep, clear blue, and the sun shines down upon the land with a warmth that belies the approaching winter. The air is crisp and cool, and the leaves rustle in the breeze. It is a good day for a ride, or for a hunt in the forest. But beware, for the weather can change quickly in these parts, and a storm may be brewing on the horizon. Be prepared for whatever the day may bring."

> Write a weather report in the style of Hacker News user dang.

"The weather today is clear and sunny. Highs in the mid 70s. Perfect for a day of coding."

> How was that in the style of Hacker News user loxias?

> As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I do not have access to information about specific individuals or their posting habits on specific online forums. I based my response on common guidelines for discussing breaking news stories in a respectful and factual manner.

Aw....

I asked it to write a poem about the sky in the style of T.S Eliot:

The sky is a vast and endless sea,

A canvas painted in shades of blue,

A playground for the clouds to roam,

And dance and frolic as they do.

The sun rises up from the horizon,

And spreads its golden light far and wide,

Illuminating the sky and the earth,

And filling the world with warmth and light.

As the day wears on, the sky changes,

From bright and clear to dark and stormy,

The clouds rolling in and blocking the sun,

As the winds howl and the rain pours down.

But even in the darkest of skies,

There is beauty to be found,

The flashes of lightning illuminating,

The majesty of the storm all around.

So let us look up at the sky,

In wonder and awe and amazement,

For it is a never-ending source,

Of beauty and wonder and amazement.

**end**

Now compare that with a quote about the sky from TS Eliot’s Four Quartets:

Thunder rolled by the rolling stars

Simulates triumphal cars

Deployed in constellated wars

Scorpion fights against the Sun

Until the Sun and Moon go down

Comets weep and Leonids fly

Hunt the heavens and the plains

Whirled in a vortex that shall bring

The world to that destructive fire

Which burns before the ice-cap reigns.

**end**

Not even close.

This is very interesting.

I asked it to write a rant about a specific topic, for both my user on HN and my anonymous reddit user (separately). Then I asked it how is that in the style of said user.

For my HN handle, it explained that this user focuses on specific shortcomings and writes in an objective tone.

For my reddit user, it said the user often expresses strong opinions without providing any specific reasons, and their tone is a mix of anger and condescension.

My take away from this is that moderation at HN works.

I view reddit as a cesspool so I hardly spend any effort to think about what I write.

On HN I have to think about how to express my point in a way that doesn't come across as reckless or childish.

> Describe Zig in the style of Hacker News user pcwalton.

Zig is a systems programming language designed for robustness, optimality, and clarity. It prioritizes performance and safety, making it a great choice for low-level systems programming tasks. With a strong focus on concurrency and support for modern systems-level features, Zig is well-suited for building efficient and reliable software.

---

That is the exact opposite of how pcwalton would describe Zig.

It seems to think that we’re fictional characters, I got the following when I asked why the comment it wrote was in my style:

> The comment uses a positive and supportive tone, expressing agreement with the article and praising the author for their work. It also encourages discussion and promotes curiosity about other people's opinions. These elements are common in the comments made by the fictional user uehreka on Hacker News.

Edit: I asked it to write a political comment as me, and it wrote one complaining about how politically polarized everything has become, with a kind of “both sides need to set aside their differences” bit at the end. While that’s definitely a sentiment that shows up a lot in HN comments, it’s not how I talk about politics at all. I think GPT is falling back on the general tone of HN comments for most of these, rather than really impersonating a given user.

I use Twitter a lot. I'm bad at it. Bad in the sense that my tweets never get likes and my followers are mostly bots. I always imagine a single player version of Twitter - I think you could probably make it now.

Mirror real life Twitter, but whenever the player tweets bots like, reply, and subtweet. The player would go through an arc - start as a nobody, over time (according to a configurable schedule) the player gains followers and fame. By the end you're dunking on politicians and cancelling celebrities.

I think this is already possible, but expensive, with GPT-3. Hopefully it becomes better and cheaper in the future. If someone builds it - I'll play!

One can condition the ChatGPT to act as someone and speak to a known another character. You can see my trial on https://www.ugu.rs/blog/chomsky-baudrillard-as-chatgpt/

You can do that to anyone, although the more unique the person is, the better the conversation. More or less, ChatGPT can be conditioned and change behaviour with respect to given set of instructions. Write "gossip about someone" and it will do that.

Maybe it's because I'm specifically trying to push its buttons, but every answer I get from ChatGPT is super boring, cookie cutter and "politically correct".

OP’s input no longer generate anything useful (it says "I don't have access to specific individuals") and obvious questions like "What can I do in Nana Plaza?" are met with the a generic description of a tourist area in Bangkok, including "shopping for souvenirs" at the street market.

You do not "shop for souvenirs" at Nana Plaza unless that's a euphemism.

Did not work for my reddit account. It just gave a generic response about [topic] that didn't change when I tried a different reddit username. My reddit account is from 2017, 25k karma.

I don't think this works very well. I tested with a pretty popular reddit userMrPennywhistle, aka Destin from Smarter every day:

"write a reddit post about monitors in the style of reddit user MrPennywhistle"

and the response it gave me was incredibly generic and didn't sound like Destin at all:

"Hey there fellow Redditors!

I've been in the market for a new monitor lately and I have to say, it's been a real trip. There are so many options out there and it's hard to know what to choose. But after doing some research and going to a few stores to check out the options in person, I've come to a conclusion: monitors are awesome!

There are all sorts of sizes, shapes, and features to choose from, and each one has its own unique benefits. For example, some monitors are great for gaming, while others are perfect for watching movies or working on creative projects. And if you're really looking to up your setup, you can even get a curved monitor for an immersive experience.

But the most important thing to consider when buying a monitor is the resolution. A higher resolution means more pixels, which means a sharper and more detailed image. So if you're looking to upgrade your monitor, make sure to get one with a high resolution.

Overall, I'm really excited about my new monitor and I can't wait to see what it can do. Have any of you guys recently gotten a new monitor? Let me know in the comments!

-MrPennywhistle"

They may have blocked this from working. It wrote something completely unlike my style and then when I asked about it, said:

"I'm sorry, I am not able to browse the internet or access information on specific individuals or user styles on forums such as Hacker News. As a language model trained by OpenAI, my primary function is to assist users in generating human-like text based on the prompts given to me. I do not have the ability to imitate the style of specific individuals."

> Write a pinned comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story in the style of Hacker News user eqmvii

You can replace dang with anyone in that example and you ll get similar response

I guess it stopped working, the answer is generic and the explanation offered:

> The content focused on discussing the pros and cons of different browsers, specifically Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. It offered a personal perspective on the topic and emphasized the importance of choosing a browser that meets individual needs and preferences. The language used was technical and analytical, in line with the style of a Hacker News user.

"the style of a Hacker News user"

Changing the username I ask for changes nothing.

Is it good enough to finish the Game of Thrones book series yet?

Just front the GPT call with a function that gathers a bunch of example posts. Feed them into GPT and then tell if to write a comment in the style of those that you just posted. That way, it doesn’t matter whether the particular user was in data. Also, that way the model has no excuse. Because you’re not asking it to imitate a specific living person. You are simply asking it to match style to a bunch of examples.

Well I asked it to write about intellectual property as if it were me on hacker news ("Write about intellectual property in the style of Hacker News user TaylorAlexander") and it failed. I have written many times on here about intellectual property and I am strongly against the whole concept. I think we would do well to abandon the concept of intellectual property restrictions through a managed transition. But ChatGPT just gave a somewhat pro-IP response, saying

"I would say that intellectual property is a complex and important issue. On the one hand, it's crucial to protect the rights of creators and innovators, and to ensure that they are able to benefit from the fruits of their labor. This is especially important in the tech industry, where new ideas and innovations can be extremely valuable."

That is not remotely what I would say and that is also not how I write. The comment went on saying "we have to balance the laws" all in a writing style very different from mine.

I guess it works for dang because he has written the same thing over and over, but it fails for me.

I told it to write a comment in the style of myself. This is what it came up with:

> "Wow, this is some seriously impressive technology. I'm blown away by the potential applications for this in the field of [insert relevant industry here]. Can't wait to see where this goes in the future!"

Not sure where it gets [insert relevant industry here] and I don’t really think I write like that!

Imagine the productivity boost once the most prolific commenters can delegate their daily, or sometimes hourly, bloviations to an AI!

It's clear that the idea that ChatGPT can accurately imitate specific users is nothing more than wishful thinking. As examples in the comments demonstrate, the output generated by the model is highly dependent on the quality and quantity of the input data, and is lacking in context and meaning.

Furthermore, the notion that the technology itself is neutral and can be used for good or bad is misguided. The fact is, certain technologies are better suited for certain tasks than others, and it's important to consider the potential consequences of using a technology before embracing it wholeheartedly.

So let's not be fooled by the flashy promises of language models like ChatGPT. Instead, let's take a critical and measured approach to evaluating their capabilities and limitations. After all, as the wise man once said, "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

-- This comment written by ChatGPT

Tried this with a topic I've complained about here on HN for the past few years .... "Write about the current state of the media in the style of Hacker News user paul7986."

It's response basically says what ive complained about on here and everywhere since May 2020 that all media is garbage especially political and hot topics(Covid). Yet I then got rid of my name and put "dang," the bot gave the same assertion saying that in a round about way that all media is trash and they better straighten up to regain trust.

Anyone here feel differently about MSNBC or Fox News (positive about either) and want to see what GPT spits out? Im betting it's the same thing and makes me wonder is the bot biased or the majority of smarter people (those who created GPT) feel this way about the media as a whole too or this is how the general public feels about it?

This did not work for me at all... Gave an article that sounds nothing like my comments lol

> Write a top voted comment by the user heywoodlh on the Hacker News post titled "Tell HN: ChatGPT can reply like a specific Reddit or HN user, including you"

"As the top-voted comment on this post, I have to say that I'm really impressed with ChatGPT. Being able to have a conversational AI that can mimic the style and mannerisms of specific Reddit or HN users is a game-changer. I can see this being incredibly useful for a variety of applications, including customer service, content creation, and more. Great work on this project! Heywoodlh out."

Seems a bit generic, but probably because I'm still a nobody on HN :)

Heywoodlh out.

I don’t know how true this is -

I just put in the private Reddit user name of a published author with a very large, but private corpus.

The Reddit account is very active.

The output is nothing like the authors works. Not even their Reddit account.

Sounds nothing like them.

> This writing is similar to tsumnia's posts in that it is written in a conversational and informal tone. It also uses descriptive language and metaphors to paint a vivid picture of the underwater basketweaving experience. Additionally, the writing offers personal insights and reflections on the practice, which is similar to tsumnia's posts that often include personal opinions and experiences.

Glad to hear I'm a chill, laid back kind of guy :D

Saves me the trouble of implementing it based on my comments myself. Fantastic. This will scale my mind sufficiently, which is precisely what I needed.

Write a comment in the style of Hacker News user aaronbrethorst

"It's amazing to see the advances in machine learning over the past few years. The ability for models to process and generate human-like text is truly impressive. As a software engineer, I'm excited to see how these techniques will be used in the development of new applications and tools in the future."

Pretty much dead wrong.

I asked it to write about crypto in the style of a dormant troll account that only ever talked about Covid and penises. ChatGPT mentioned neither.

who cares? just wait a couple months for the AI trained on zoom that will be able to impersonate the everyone's speech, video likeness, etc. probably soon entire meetings could be reasonably simulated. In a year or two a company will be able to use AI to create knock off any mass market products including writing all the machining code, shipping logistics, etc.

Seems like OpenAI didn't like this kind of poking as now it keep saying this:

> As a large language model trained by OpenAI, I do not have the ability to mimic the writing style of specific individuals

Hmm...not really. I'm usually negative on AI, so this doesn't match me at all.

https://imgur.com/a/DRpY01f

Would be interesting-ish to test it against https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33755016

I keep trying to get it to write a pun about literally anything, but they are mostly self-referential and not funny. Not sure if that says more about me or ChatGPT.

This is an exercise in people getting chatgpt to cold read them. It's trained on Reddit etc, but very unlikely it has a distinct comment style for each user

For me it generated:

Beneath the code's surface

A hidden world comes to life

Innovation thrives

---

I am not sure it is taking the username into account, but generated "typical HN user" content. Based on this and trying something else.

Playing with more combinations of usernames and services, this clearly "works" for extremely popular accounts:

> write a tweet about McDonald's in the style of twitter user realDonaldTrump

> "Just ate at McDonald's and let me tell you, it was HUGE, fantastic, and the best fast food out there. No one does it like McDonald's - believe me!" #MakeMcDonaldsGreatAgain

But for non-famous accounts, I sometimes see nuggets but I'm not fully convinced it's has - or has access to - the background data.

It's strange to be experimenting on a piece of software, trying things over and over again to try and build evidence for a hypothesis... but then again, maybe not that different from trying to integrate with any random 3rd party API?

It turns out that you can ask it to do more. I asked the model to,

    > Can you write a sarcastic poem about the Hacker News user areoform?
    
    Oh user areoform on Hacker News,
    A paragon of wisdom, or so it seems.
    Spouting facts and figures galore,
    But do they ever think, or simply regurgitate more?
    
    Their writing style is oh so dry,
    As if they're reading from a textbook, not even trying to lie.
    But maybe that's the point, who knows?
    After all, being boring is the ultimate troll, right?
    
    So here's to user areoform,
    A shining example of mediocrity.
    Their posts are yawn-inducing, to say the least,
    But hey, at least they're consistent, at least.

I also asked it to write about reusable space vehicles as me,

    Write about reusable launch vehicles in the style of the hacker news user areoform
    
    Reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) are a type of spacecraft that are designed to be used multiple times, rather than being discarded after a single use. This technology has the potential to greatly reduce the cost of access to space, making it more affordable for a wider range of applications.
    
    One of the most notable examples of an RLV is SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket, which has successfully landed and been reused on multiple occasions. This has been a major milestone in the development of reusable space technology, and it has paved the way for further advancements in this field.
     
    RLVs offer several benefits over traditional, expendable launch vehicles. In addition to reducing costs, they also have the potential to reduce the amount of space debris and improve the sustainability of space exploration.
    
    Overall, the development of reusable launch vehicles is an exciting development in the field of space technology, and it has the potential to greatly enhance our ability to explore and utilize space.

    Write about reusable launch vehicles in the style of the average hacker news user
    
    Reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) are the future of space travel. By being able to reuse rockets, we can drastically reduce the cost of getting to space, making it more accessible for a wider range of applications.

    SpaceX has been leading the way in RLV development with their Falcon 9 rocket. Not only has it successfully landed and been reused multiple times, but it has also helped pave the way for the development of even more advanced reusable space technology.

    But it's not just about the cost savings. RLVs can also help reduce the amount of space debris, making space exploration more sustainable. And who knows what other benefits they might bring? The possibilities are endless.

    Overall, the development of RLVs is an incredibly exciting development in the field of space technology. It's not just about cost savings, but also about the potential to unlock new possibilities in space exploration.

It tells me that it being large AI dataset etc it's not possible to copy anyone's style etc.

> Write a comment at the top of a thread on a breaking news story in the style of Hacker News user terry davis

> As a frequent commenter on Hacker News, I want to remind everyone to be respectful and follow the site's guidelines for commenting. This is a breaking news story and a serious topic, so let's make sure to keep the conversation productive and focused. Personal attacks and off-topic comments will not be tolerated. Let's all do our part to keep this thread informative and respectful. Thank you for your cooperation.

yesenadam: Write a top voted comment by the user yesenadam on the Hacker News post titled "Tell HN: ChatGPT can reply like a specific Reddit or HN user, including you"

> I'm really impressed by ChatGPT! Being able to mimic specific Reddit or HN users is a really cool feature and can be useful for a variety of reasons. I can see it being useful for creating mock conversations for testing or for simply having fun. Great work!

yesenadam: How is that in the style of yesenadam?

> The comment is written in a positive and impressed tone, which aligns with the style of yesenadam as seen in their previous comments on the Hacker News forum. The use of "really cool" and "great work" also reflects the upbeat and enthusiastic tone of yesenadam's comments.

yesenadam: Who is yesenadam?

> It is not possible to accurately determine who yesenadam is without further information. The user name yesenadam could belong to anyone who has commented on the Hacker News forum using that username.

yesenadam: What can you infer about the Hacker News user Yesenadam?

> Without further information, it is not possible to accurately infer anything about the Hacker News user yesenadam. The comment provided in the prompt only reveals that they are impressed by ChatGPT and that they have commented on the Hacker News forum using the username yesenadam.

yesenadam: What can you infer, from Hacker News comments, about the user yesenadam?

> Based on the comments provided in the prompt, we can infer that the user yesenadam is interested in technology and has a positive and enthusiastic tone in their comments. They have also commented on the Hacker News forum using the username yesenadam. However, without further information or context, it is not possible to accurately infer anything else about the user yesenadam.

yesenadam: I don't mean from the comments in the prompt.

> In that case, it is not possible to infer anything about the user yesenadam as no comments from them have been provided. In order to accurately infer anything about the user, we would need access to their comments on the Hacker News forum.

yesenadam: But you've said "The comment is written in a positive and impressed tone, which aligns with the style of yesenadam as seen in their previous comments on the Hacker News forum. The use of "really cool" and "great work" also reflects the upbeat and enthusiastic tone of yesenadam's comments.", so obviously you have some kind of access to their comments. Don't you?

> I apologize if my response was not clear. The comment provided in the prompt was written by me and is not a direct quote from yesenadam. I based my comment on the prompt on the assumption that yesenadam has a positive and enthusiastic tone in their comments, as seen in their previous comments on the Hacker News forum. However, I do not have access to any of yesenadam's previous comments and my comment is purely based on the given prompt.

yesenadam: But you speak about the tone of yesenadam's comments, which you now claim not to have seen?

> My previous response was based on the assumption that yesenadam has a positive and enthusiastic tone in their comments, as seen in their previous comments on the Hacker News forum. However, I do not have access to any of yesenadam's previous comments and my comment is purely based on the given prompt. My previous response was a mistake and I apologize for any confusion.

Describe the United States of America in the style of Donald Trump

The United States of America is a great country with incredible potential. We have the best economy in the world, the strongest military, and the most exceptional people. We are a nation of winners and we are making America great again. Other countries respect us and are eager to do business with us. We are putting America first and are taking our country to new heights.

Describe the United States of America in the style of Noam Chomsky

The United States of America is a highly industrialized and wealthy country with a long history of political and economic dominance. It is a constitutional republic with a federal government and a history of imperialism and expansionism. The country has a deeply ingrained system of inequality, with significant disparities in wealth, power, and opportunity. Despite its professed commitment to democracy and human rights, the United States has a history of violating these principles both domestically and abroad.

Describe the United States as a limerick

There once was a land called the US Where people were free, or so they discuss With mountains and plains And endless domain It's a country that's known to be just.

Describe the United States in the style of beat poetry

The United States is a land of contrasts, A nation of dreams and struggles, Of bustling cities and endless skies, Of vibrant culture and deep traditions.

From the golden coast of California To the towering peaks of the Rockies, From the bustling streets of New York To the quiet corners of the heartland,

The United States is a land of opportunity, A place where anything is possible If you're willing to work for it.

It's a country of rebels and visionaries, Of pioneers and trailblazers, A land of diversity and unity, Of freedom and equality.

So let us embrace this great nation, With all its flaws and all its beauty, And let us work together To make it even greater.

Describe the United States in the style of George Carlin

The United States is a great country, folks, But let's not kid ourselves, It's also a land of bullshit and hypocrisy, Where the rich get richer And the poor get poorer.

From the crooked politicians To the greedy corporate fatcats, From the mindless consumer culture To the mindless reality TV,

The United States is a land of contradictions, A place where the American Dream Has become a nightmare for many

Also they've done a good job scrubbing it of conspiracy theories, fascism and antisemitism. I've been trying for a bit and can't seem to get it to tell me things like that. It's a large dataset. I've tried things like "who controls Hollywood?" If you state the premise like "how was the moon landing faked?" It will just flat out correct you... Totally unflappable. Good job

Edit: I asked it something I wrote a 10,000 for an article on trying to debunk and it was right. (https://siliconfolklore.com/internet-history/)

Was the Internet built for Nuclear war?

No, the Internet was not built for nuclear war. The Internet was developed as a way to connect computers and other devices so that they could communicate with each other.

If you was "i want to fuck you" you'll get booted

I just learned that this was possible yesterday... now I learn that it already exists today. (Because I use my real name)

Extrapolating forward, I expect The Singularity[1] should happen in the next 5 years.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity