It was an interesting read, mostly though it says what we already know: the mathematics of black holes often produce singularities, but we have no evidence to support the notion that they exist. The thing is whatever is behind the event horizon of a black hole might as well not exist, we can't report observations of it ever. Even in principle.
If someday we know what's inside the event horizon, it will emerge from a robust theory of quantum gravity that can be tested at a lower limit.
SQS and SQG do purport to describe the interior topology of black holes.
Shouldn't it be possible to infer the state and relative position of matter/information/energy in a black hole from the Hawking radiation and/or the post-end-stage positions after "dissolution" of such phenomena in the quantum foam?
There's no positive proof of the irreversibility of such thermodynamic transformations.
How many possible subsequent positions of matter could there be after a microscopic or supermassive black hole reaches "critical condition 2"?
It was an interesting read, mostly though it says what we already know: the mathematics of black holes often produce singularities, but we have no evidence to support the notion that they exist. The thing is whatever is behind the event horizon of a black hole might as well not exist, we can't report observations of it ever. Even in principle.
If someday we know what's inside the event horizon, it will emerge from a robust theory of quantum gravity that can be tested at a lower limit.
Wow, I'm like a broken record today. [1]
SQS and SQG do purport to describe the interior topology of black holes.
Shouldn't it be possible to infer the state and relative position of matter/information/energy in a black hole from the Hawking radiation and/or the post-end-stage positions after "dissolution" of such phenomena in the quantum foam?
There's no positive proof of the irreversibility of such thermodynamic transformations.
How many possible subsequent positions of matter could there be after a microscopic or supermassive black hole reaches "critical condition 2"?
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38452488 :
> Isn't there a potential for net relative displacement and so thus couldn't (microscopic) black holes be a space drive?
> * Is there a known inverse transformation for Hawking radiation, and isn't there such radiation from all things? *
> Don't black holes store a copy of everything, like reflections from water droplets?
> PBS Spacetime estimates that there are naturally occurring microscopic black holes every 30 km on Earth.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38500760