talldayo 14 days ago

I would assume it's a statement on determinism. The phrase is based on the dual usage of "just" in meaning "simply" the first time, and then "rationally" in the next. It seems the author wants you to refuse the simple understanding of things and focus on the causal chain-of-events leading up to them instead.

That's just my interpretation, though. "Just" is also commonly used as a term for religious righteousness, which could also change the meaning. I'm unfamiliar with Jim Rohn too, if that helps :P

davidcollantes 14 days ago

I see the phrase as this:

- "Things don't just happen; things simply are."

- "Things don't just happen by chance; things occur for a reason."

- "There are no accidents; everything happens for a purpose."

Or, as a my teenager would say:

"Things don't just happen; things happen just because."

jjgreen 14 days ago

You're right to be confused, it's fairly ungrammatical, one would typically use the adjectival form there: "... things happen justly" but then it wouldn't scan as well.

miles 14 days ago

It might be expressed another way as:

"Things don't merely happen; things happen as they should (as deserved/merited/earned)."