That OP is twisting this as hard as they can, into a show of 'Ukrainian weakness'. Apparently, deploying a new battle technique can be slammed as desperate.
The mindset of the article is old-fashion.
It labels the use of RC as a sign of weakness -- as if sending soldiers which end up as casualties is a sign of strength.
The Ukrainians won that battle with significant less human loss and cheap tech. That's all that counts tactically?
That OP is twisting this as hard as they can, into a show of 'Ukrainian weakness'. Apparently, deploying a new battle technique can be slammed as desperate.
The mindset of the article is old-fashion. It labels the use of RC as a sign of weakness -- as if sending soldiers which end up as casualties is a sign of strength.
The Ukrainians won that battle with significant less human loss and cheap tech. That's all that counts tactically?