points by Eisenstein 7 months ago

> Their copyright takedown system has been around for many years and wasn't contingent on AI.

So what? It could rely on tea leaves and leprechauns, it illustrates that whatever automation works will be relied on at the expense of any human staff or process

> it 99% likely violates their terms of use, in which case there's nothing to say.

Isn't that 1% the edge cases I am specifically mentioning are important and won't get addressed?

> doesn't mean they'll be employed if customers dislike it.

The customers on ad supported internet platforms are the advertisers and they are fine with it.

> You're jumping to conclusions. That is the entire point of my response.

Conclusions based on solid reason and evidenced by past events.

> AI isn't there yet, notwithstanding, if they did a good job 98% of the time then who cares? No one.

Until you realize that 2% of 2.89billion monthly users is 57,800,000.