Unsurprising, Mark Zuck always seems to have an app ready, remember Threads? Its no secret that he can just throw a few devs money and get something going awfully quickly.
Cut a few corners its fine, just need to get it out the door.
As a parent, this kind of behavior leads to escalation and is indicative of adolescents in grades K-6. Usually people grow out of it before they reach adulthood.
Our ability to suppress our desire for revenge is what makes society work.
Much like tolerance. You can’t have a free market if all parties don’t agree. The US proposed a free market. China countered with a closed market and we’re finally understanding they were serious.
Unsurprising, Mark Zuck always seems to have an app ready, remember Threads? Its no secret that he can just throw a few devs money and get something going awfully quickly.
Cut a few corners its fine, just need to get it out the door.
Gosh this is disgusting
What’s “this”?
It looks as if US is banning foreign apps to aid domestic apps. It shows a bias and paternalism rather than a more laissez-faire/free market approach.
I like it. “You ban ours and we’ll ban yours” type of approach
As a parent, this kind of behavior leads to escalation and is indicative of adolescents in grades K-6. Usually people grow out of it before they reach adulthood.
Our ability to suppress our desire for revenge is what makes society work.
Usually adults both work together and play by the same rules, no? Is China working together in cases outside of this?
In prisoners dilemma tit for tat is a winning strategy for a reason.
Much like tolerance. You can’t have a free market if all parties don’t agree. The US proposed a free market. China countered with a closed market and we’re finally understanding they were serious.
The US did not ban a foreign app. The US demanded that the app be divested from its ownership by a hostile foreign government.
The free market has always been secondary to natsec interests.
I understand the difference. That is why I worded it as "It looks as if".