So what.
…if society continues to delegate more of their work to AI then we are going to fall back into the grips that inform us that some people are better at things than other people are and some are worse at things than other people are and this is what lies beneath the bridge of relying or not relying on AI to leverage your capacity to think and act on what you feel.
I think that People who will be willing to put in effort for their crafts without AI will be the ones who will be willing to try out new things and seek opportunities for ingenuity in the future. I think that the problem people have with this idea is that it runs counter to notions related to—ahem—
diversity, equity and inclusion…
On one hand and on it’s little finger is the legitimate concern that if companies who develop LLMs are not transparent with the technologies they make available to users when generating code, then they’ll hide all the scary and dangerous things that they make available to the people who’ll think, act and feel corrupt regardless of the tools they wield to impose disadvantages onto others. But I don’t think that will make a difference.
The only way out is hard work in a world bent on making the work easy after it makes you weak.
I think it’s very easy to say people dislike the notion you said cause it goes against DEI (the e stands for equality btw), like it’s such an easy scapegoat.
People just don’t wanna put the work in, or aren’t able to put the work in cause they are busy surviving day to day, y’know, putting food on the table. Cause that is not a given for everyone.
> DEI (the e stands for equality btw),
According to whom? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity%2C_equity%2C_and_inc...
I know I didn’t make it easy to catch, but I think you may have misread me.
I wasn’t referring to “DEI” as in the corpo-state initiative but the concepts themselves as they’re received independent of how they’re packaged in the acronym; in a political context.
In this way, I think to call it “scapegoating” would do a disservice to a legitimate social conflict.
I agree with your final observation in general, but what’s your point?