Glad to see people working on this, but I really wish the maintainers would change its name - RustFS just seems way too confusing and generic a name for an S3-compatible storage layer.
This is a good step, but it would help to benchmark the project against S3 and its capabilities. Of course it wont be at parity, but it will be useful for people to plan their workloads around this project.
> RustFS is under rapid development. Do NOT use in production environments!
So think twice before adopting it.
Glad to see people working on this, but I really wish the maintainers would change its name - RustFS just seems way too confusing and generic a name for an S3-compatible storage layer.
This is a good step, but it would help to benchmark the project against S3 and its capabilities. Of course it wont be at parity, but it will be useful for people to plan their workloads around this project.