points by paulvnickerson 10 months ago Maybe if Wikipedia sourced more peer reviewed publications and less Vox, I would be more satisfied. Thrilled to see Grokipedia as a competitor that could perhaps pressure Wikipedia to improve its editorial policies.
antoniojtorres 10 months ago I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
whoknowsidont 10 months ago If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is. unethical_ban 10 months ago Poe's Law in effect.
advisedwang 10 months ago Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash. tapete2 10 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
tapete2 10 months ago Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.
I can’t, in good conscience, think that Musk would objectively be a good steward of an encyclopedia.
If this isn't ragebait I don't know what is.
Poe's Law in effect.
Did they omit Wikipedia when creating the models behind Grokipedia? Otherwise it less a competitor and more a re-hash.
Well, some of the "articles" on Grokipedia even state that they were sourced from Wikipedia.