These are from one set of 302s that were finally released:
From the first interview:
> EPSTEIN talked about blackmailing people in front of ■. ■ was confident TRUMP knew EPSTEIN blackmailed people because she heard EPSTEIN and TRUMP talking about it. ■ stated she knew TRUMP had illegal building permits. She heard him (TRUMP) talking about washing money through casinos. Number 6 is Donald Trump's favorite number. was not sure how she knew that, but she had heard it at one point. ■ stated that EPSTEIN's blackmailing of her mother, "ruined my family".
From the last (4th interview):
> She indicated she was aware that because she was victimized several years prior, the statutes of limitation of any viable federal violation may have run. She asked agents, "what's the point?" The agents explained that all victims of crime should have the opportunity to tell their story; they wanted to provide her with that opportunity should she choose to accept. The agents also explained why they wished to keep the fourth interview focused on abuse ■ endured at the hands of individuals associated with JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ■ previously mentioned she had sexual contact with (current U.S. President) DONALD TRUMP while she was a minor. She previously explained the contact was facilitated through her association with EPSTEIN. ■ was asked whether she felt comfortable detailing her contacts with TRUMP. ■ again asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it
So this wasn't a salacious quip from the tipline, they believed her enough to interview her 4 times.
Not only did the FBI think it worth conducting four interviews, FBI interviews aren't exactly cheerful friendly interchanges. If the interviewee lied in an interview that's prosecutable whether or not it was under oath.
why would you interview someone four times unless you had a good reason to believe they were telling the truth
You wouldn't.
These are from one set of 302s that were finally released:
From the first interview:
> EPSTEIN talked about blackmailing people in front of ■. ■ was confident TRUMP knew EPSTEIN blackmailed people because she heard EPSTEIN and TRUMP talking about it. ■ stated she knew TRUMP had illegal building permits. She heard him (TRUMP) talking about washing money through casinos. Number 6 is Donald Trump's favorite number. was not sure how she knew that, but she had heard it at one point. ■ stated that EPSTEIN's blackmailing of her mother, "ruined my family".
From the last (4th interview):
> She indicated she was aware that because she was victimized several years prior, the statutes of limitation of any viable federal violation may have run. She asked agents, "what's the point?" The agents explained that all victims of crime should have the opportunity to tell their story; they wanted to provide her with that opportunity should she choose to accept. The agents also explained why they wished to keep the fourth interview focused on abuse ■ endured at the hands of individuals associated with JEFFREY EPSTEIN. ■ previously mentioned she had sexual contact with (current U.S. President) DONALD TRUMP while she was a minor. She previously explained the contact was facilitated through her association with EPSTEIN. ■ was asked whether she felt comfortable detailing her contacts with TRUMP. ■ again asked what the point would be of providing the information at this point in her life when there was a strong possibility nothing could be done about it
So this wasn't a salacious quip from the tipline, they believed her enough to interview her 4 times.
Not only did the FBI think it worth conducting four interviews, FBI interviews aren't exactly cheerful friendly interchanges. If the interviewee lied in an interview that's prosecutable whether or not it was under oath.
We must impeach and jail the sucker.
That's never going to happen, since both parties are deeply complicit.
Apropos of nothing, how much dead weight do you think the streetlights in Washington DC could support?
Don't try to both sides this. Are there any instances of the Democrats bluffing? Or anyone successfully calling a bluff?