georgeburdell 11 hours ago

I can’t read the article, but I hope their definition of upper middle class adjusts for the steep inflation in housing. If my family knew how much I made, approximately the top 1% of incomes, they’d think I live a fantastically luxurious lifestyle. In reality, I live in the same kind of 3 bed 2 bath house I grew up because houses are now 5x more expensive.

  • bayarearefugee 9 hours ago

    > I can’t read the article

    https://archive.ph/2026.04.05-025428/https://www.wsj.com/eco...

    "Upper middle class" for a family is $133k according to them.

    Things look very rosy for our economy as long as you're using 1963 numbers as your poverty baseline and extrapolating from there.

    • laughing_man 7 hours ago

      $133k is upper middle class. It just doesn't feel like upper middle class if you're living in NYC or San Francisco.

      • pharaohgeek 2 hours ago

        It doesn't feel like it if you're living in MOST places. I bought my first house 6 months after graduating from college (2000). It cost me roughly 3x my salary at the time. I know what I pay new grads right now, and it's way more than I made back then. There's no way they can afford a house like that at 3x their salary. It's closer to 4-5x, and we are nowhere near as expensive in this area as NYC, SF, DC, etc.

      • bayarearefugee 1 hour ago

        133k for a family of 3 is effectively poverty wages in NYC or SF.

        In less HCOL areas it is getting by, but possibly never owning a house.

        Hardly the upper middle class lifestyle one imagines being lived by doctors, lawyers, etc in times past.