points by jnwatson 3 days ago

Fable 5 on Max knocks it out of the park:

https://imgur.com/a/usR8K7G

Definitely has some creative flourishes.

(I made no extra prompting. Just the above text. Single shot.)

zombot 3 days ago

rex paludis is a nice touch.

  • amarant 3 days ago

    It's even Carolus rex paludis! Not sure if fable is a history buff or a Sabaton fan, but I repeat myself.

    • pvaldes 2 days ago

      Frogando III of Haunchburg, AKA Frognando the Tadporrible

xeromal 3 days ago

I'm out of credits or I would've tried fable. I knew it would do well

nathanappere 3 days ago

It makes the frog a king which is not in the prompt, so there is a bit of confusion.

  • DimitriBouriez 3 days ago

    I'm afraid you'll need to look up "Habsburg" yourself.

    • TonyStr 3 days ago

      Nathan is right though. It specifies a Habsburg jaw, not that the frog is a Habsburg king/prince. It's understandable that the LLM will hallucinate a king from this, but it isn't what's being asked of it.

      • tjoff 3 days ago

        It's not hallucination. The prompt lacks details and given that an AI or a human has some artistic freedom. After all, that is why current AI is usable at all.

      • bulbar 3 days ago

        When I ask to create an image of a smartphone, it will most likely show the front and while it's turned on, even though it's not mentioned. For a person, it will add clothing.

        Adding things that are not explicitly stated in the prompt but that are probable are the main benefit of AI, as far as I am concerned.

        • inigyou 3 days ago

          I'm afraid you'll need to look up "frog prince" yourself. It was fictional.

          • bulbar 1 day ago

            Not sure what the argument here is. I expect AI to consider fictional entities if they are semantically connected to the prompt.

      • rcxdude 2 days ago

        An artist given the same prompt would likely do something similar.

inigyou 3 days ago

Uh, it failed the test by assuming it was royalty.