donatj 1 minute ago

> This suggests that people are drawn to AI that unquestioningly validate, even as that validation risks eroding their judgment

I this is a larger problem than just AI. The interned has empowered people to surround themselves with voices that agree with them and validate them, often to their own harm.

There are entire communities devoted to cutting people who disagree with you out of your life.

accountrequired 54 minutes ago

You're absolutely right!

  • pwdisswordfishq 10 minutes ago

    It's a pretty overdone joke at this point, don't you think?

    • tom_ 6 minutes ago

      It's not a joke-it's an honest fact.

    • accountrequired 3 minutes ago

      You made an excellent point! (could not resist that one)

Kattywumpus 32 minutes ago

I don't know. Upvotes often do the same thing, especially in siloed communities. I feel like this is a larger problem -- people leaning into extremifying their views or just playing to an audience -- even though one might frame it as "prosocial" because it happens within the context of an online community.

  • smcg 15 minutes ago

    Both could be true. People follow incentives.

LAC-Tech 56 minutes ago

I think this goes along way to explain people's very defensive reactions when you are skeptical about Agentic Development.

  • qarl2 39 minutes ago

    I'm one of the people who gets accused of this. I don't mind skepticism. But every time I turn around, someone's claiming nobody gets any value from these tools and anyone who says otherwise is deluded or running a scam. That gets really old.

    • LAC-Tech 4 minutes ago

      I can believe people get value out of them. I think I do.

      But "OH MY GOD EVERYTHING HAS CHANGED THE OLD WAY IS DEAD 10X MORE PRODUCTIVE" - no. If that were true, we'd notice it in the software all around us.

  • artnanika 36 minutes ago

    Those are two different things. Chatgpt being sycophantic while playing the role of a therapist with a teenager is much different from Codex being sycophantic while reviewing user feedback. The former is extremely dangerous for society.

atleastoptimal 1 hour ago

This is true, but likely happening in talk therapy too with overly sycyphantic therapists

  • jalev 56 minutes ago

    Sure, but there is a marked difference between a therapist and an LLM Chatbot: you can't talk to your therapist for +4h a day, at any time convenient to yourself. It's also not a guarantee you're going to hit upon a therapist that is like that, versus a product that is very literally intended to maximise your usage of it.

    • paimapi 49 minutes ago

      a therapist should, if they follow their training, not be a sycophant whatsoever. CBT, for eg, is a multi-step process including Socratic self-dialogue, reframing practices, etc to guide the person towards the development of insight and healthier coping mechanisms