sph 6 days ago

Seeing stuff like this reminds me why I got into computers in the late 90s. Human ingenuity paired with love for the art and the craft.

Good to have a reminder that it’s software engineering that has changed, not me.

  • yesitcan 5 days ago

    Things were less load-bearing back then.

joshuaS98 5 days ago

``` How can people write big systems in general?

We do, but as you say, they're often debugged into existence rather than cleanly designed into existence. ```

glimshe 6 days ago

A small window to how we used to spread deep computer topics in the 90s. No substacks or X posts. Very cool.

  • sph 6 days ago

    No boring themes either. There was more than the corporate bland aesthetic.

    • p-e-w 5 days ago

      They all converged to looking the same though.

      An unreadable fantasy font logo at the top, multiple concentric frames, dot lines, l33t speech etc.

      And I absolutely remember people complaining about slop in such intros even in the 90s, they just didn’t use that term.

atannen 6 days ago

Good interview with McIlroy. Fix this: Goldstine, as in the citations, not Goldstein, as in the body text.

Also, the text mentions CDC 1620. I don't think this existed. Either it was IBM 1620 or CDC something else.

I'd be just as happy with clear readable type, but the content is the thing.

guerrilla 6 days ago

Wow, it's been a while since anyone published anything this interesting.

  • jenders 6 days ago

    Agreed. Love stuff like this. Keep it comin’

bargainbin 1 week ago

Love the aesthetic. There was another ezine like this years ago focused on cybersecurity, I’ve forgotten its name now but the ASCII art involved was top notch.

Does anyone have any idea? It was definitely when Twitter was still Twitter as I remember reaching out to them about their ASCII art.

  • mckirk 1 week ago

    Maybe you're thinking of Phrack [1]? I wonder if there'll be another edition of it, and if yes what it would look like, now that the AIpocalypse seems to have reached security research...

    [1]: https://phrack.org

    • bargainbin 1 week ago

      Not Phrack but I did find it, ThugCrowd [1]!

      [1]: https://thugcrowd.com/archive.html

      Edit to add, apparently one of the ThugCrowd people is part of tmp.0ut so that would explain why my mind immediately went there.

    • guitmz 1 week ago

      there will be a new Phrack this year still!

      • mckirk 1 week ago

        Thank you, that is very reassuring to know :D

        (and interactions like these are part of the reason why I <3 HN)

NDlurker 5 days ago

The mixtape is great. Not sure what genre this would be considered but it's very interesting

https://soundcloud.com/blotter1/blotter_tmp0ut_2026

  • nanoxide 5 days ago

    I'm sure someone has a more precise idea on what it's called, but I would lean towards minimal DnB.

  • skrebbel 5 days ago

    Feels a bit like a waste that the lovely diskmag interface doesn't seem to have a play button for this mixtape. Hope they add that in future issues.

debo_ 6 days ago

The interview with Doug McIlroy is incredible. It's almost worth a link all on its own.

iberator 6 days ago

Very cool and BBS/hacking style. BUT almost useless on mobile :(

I prefer to use a PC but that kind of articles are perfect to read when commuting.

You could just use <br> instead of fixed length words per line.

  • russellbeattie 6 days ago

    Agreed. Though apparently you're being downvoted for a legitimate issue. I'm laying down using my phone and it's not particularly enjoyable to read.

    It's 2026 - the site can look like an old-skool zine being displayed with monospace fonts on a computer monitor and easily still have alternate formats for mobile devices. Not having it is just pure laziness.

    I wouldn't mind if Reader Mode could deal with the text, but it can't. Oh well.

harel 5 days ago

This reminds me that I have a stack of 2600 magazines in the garage somewhere. I need to revisit them...

  • Insanity 5 days ago

    Damn, that's a lot of magazines!

    Sorry, couldn't resist. Never got those as it was a bit before my time, I started coding in 2004'ish in EU and wasn't aware of 2600 until much later. Not sure if they ever moved digital?

    • harel 5 days ago

      Ha! It took me a few more ms than it should have. Yes it seems they have digitised at least in part: https://www.2600.com/

nekooooo 6 days ago

wow, actual hackers

chews 5 days ago

really missed an opportunity to make this available via SSH shell or renderable in lynx.

8bitsrule 5 days ago

When I zoom in, the right half of the page becomes invisible.

pixelpoet 5 days ago

Is the zero instead of capital O in the title intentional?

  • jolmg 5 days ago

    https://tmpout.sh/5/1.html

    > Welcome to tmp.0ut Volume 5!

    They are kinda inconsistent about it, looking at the social media handles, ascii logos, etc.

  • skrebbel 5 days ago

    Decades before leetcode, we already had leetspeak! This is that.

BodyCulture 5 days ago

It would be great if you hacked your website to be better usable on a smaller mobile device! I need to zoom in to read, but then I also need to scroll sideways because of fixed layout.

You can do both, achieve a cool retro style and publish in a more modern format that supports multiple output devices.

  • hk__2 5 days ago

    …Or use a non-modern format and serve it as .txt, which supports all devices. The only downside is you’ll lose colors, but they are not strictly required.

megagpt1 5 days ago

Cloudflare's captcha uses half of the obfuscation techniques from the code virtualization article, but in javascript

  • monster_truck 5 days ago

    So does alibaba for their platform anti abuse/fingerprinting shit