Love it (the mockery, that is). So far Opus 5.5 feels noticeably better in this regard (oh, and it’s fast!), but I felt the same about Fable initially. Not buying into the nerfing theories yet but if I find myself going into LLM-tilt again soon then I might join the club.
Love it (the mockery, that is). So far Opus 5.5 feels noticeably better in this regard (oh, and it’s fast!), but I felt the same about Fable initially. Not buying into the nerfing theories yet but if I find myself going into LLM-tilt again soon then I might join the club.
See the load bearing vocabulary of Claude: https://louisabraham.github.io/load-bearing/
Discussed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49461817
I laughed, and then I cried, and then I laughed again. Bravo. I'm going to go vomit while trying not to choke it up with laughter.
It would be hilarious if this was generated by a markov chain or something so it would infinitely scroll. Infinite Claude.
So like, who writes like this and how do we delete them from the training corpus?
At this point, training on public codebases created by "You're Absolutely Right!"-era Claude...
Fable 5.1 makes everything a "Rung". These statistical markers are very annoying.
It drives me bananas. This post is so triggering.