When "Safety Filter" isn't defined it's a very convenient response.
In this case it appears it's a "Safety of Meta's relationship with the Commander-in-Chief", it would seem. Nah, wind that back, it's more likely incompetence than malice, as per the old adage. It probably is some kind of filtering oversight, but it's still a bad look and more evidence of the arbitrary and difficult to predict/control nature of AI/LLMs.
It's also much more likely that Meta products will have much greater access to the Brazilian market if a U.S. friendly leader is elected. The alternative would push the alignment closer to using Chinese services. Brazil is kind of a battleground between Chinese and U.S. influence.
10% of their global income is from scam, In Poland reportedly 37%. Do you think they'll stop faking reality, and dividing and deceiving people when they make money out of that?
When "Safety Filter" isn't defined it's a very convenient response.
In this case it appears it's a "Safety of Meta's relationship with the Commander-in-Chief", it would seem. Nah, wind that back, it's more likely incompetence than malice, as per the old adage. It probably is some kind of filtering oversight, but it's still a bad look and more evidence of the arbitrary and difficult to predict/control nature of AI/LLMs.
It's also much more likely that Meta products will have much greater access to the Brazilian market if a U.S. friendly leader is elected. The alternative would push the alignment closer to using Chinese services. Brazil is kind of a battleground between Chinese and U.S. influence.
No, Meta, really? Who would have thought?
10% of their global income is from scam, In Poland reportedly 37%. Do you think they'll stop faking reality, and dividing and deceiving people when they make money out of that?