lubujackson 45 minutes ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
programd 57 minutes ago For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the articlehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...
donbox 1 hour ago Paywalled :( masfuerte 1 hour ago I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works. embedding-shape 58 minutes ago And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp... colesantiago 48 minutes ago Why not pay for it then? donbox 24 minutes ago I did but not all HN readers can.
embedding-shape 58 minutes ago And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
colesantiago 48 minutes ago Why not pay for it then? donbox 24 minutes ago I did but not all HN readers can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
Since they neglect to show you the full, actual photo.
For the record this is the actual photo discussed in the article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_%28photogr...
Paywalled :(
I didn't notice. I have JS disabled and it just works.
And also seemingly they put the worst possible version of the photo? Wikipedia has much better versions on the right-hand side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulevard_du_Temple_(photograp...
Why not pay for it then?
I did but not all HN readers can.