points by cassianoleal 14 hours ago

So you think it would be better if the EU started a war with a member state that failed to uphold the union's laws?

lukan 12 hours ago

Why would he or she think that? Your questions are close to strawman arguments in my perception.

  • cassianoleal 5 hours ago

    Let's follow the timeline, shall we? It shouldn't be difficult as it's a pretty linear tree in the comments.

    1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48423657

    I mentioned that Europe is a lot more than the EU, and even within the EU member countries diverge.

    2. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48423908

    trumpdong then makes a comment that I interpret as saying the EU doesn't have a lot of power over member states, and saying that the worst which could happen to one of them is to be kicked out of the EU.

    3. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48424244

    Slightly shocked by the idea that the EU should be doing something worse than expelling a member for not following the Union's rules, I use a _reductio ad absurdum_ and ask if they thought the EU should be harder and actually perform an armed invasion of a member state that didn't follow them.

    4. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425100

    To my shock, trumpdong literally says "yes".

    5. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48425487

    I, due to the shock described above, decide to question again in more words if that's actually what they mean.

    ---

    Hopefully that responds your question. I see no straw man, but if you still do, please present it.